clearest

Marley showing a frontal view not the clearest pic but I don't have much time to snap his pic he's on the act all the measure The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. Friend of Hotdog communicate!Joined: 2007/7/31From: AlabamaPosts: -4Online! Beautiful wispy coat he's a cutie!Rose Marley does have some fly away hair right now it was very windy the day I took this pic I'd say he's having a bad hair day Friend of Hotdog communicate!Joined: 2005/11/20From: Shadyside. OhioPosts: -1 My Darling how handsome you look and those dark eyes are gorgeous. Chase

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://hotdogblog.com/modules/xcgal/displayimage.php?pid=27370&com_id=73763&com_rootid=73763&#comment73763

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Marley showing a frontal view not the clearest pic but I don't undergo much time to snap his pic he's on the move all the time The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. Beautiful wispy cover he's a cutie!Rose Marley does undergo some fly away hair alter now it was very windy the day I took this pic I'd say he's having a bad hair day Friend of Hotdog communicate!Joined: 2005/11/20From: Shadyside. OhioPosts: 6 Friend of Hotdog Blog!Joined: 2006/1/16From: LIVERPOOL UKPosts: -2 My Darling how handsome you look and those dark eyes are gorgeous. follow

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://hotdogblog.com/modules/xcgal/displayimage.php?pid=27370&com_id=73744&com_rootid=73744&#comment73744

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Marley showing a frontal believe not the clearest pic but I don't undergo much measure to snap his pic he's on the move all the time The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their circumscribe. Friend of Hotdog Blog!Joined: 2007/7/31From: AlabamaPosts: 186Online! Beautiful wispy cover he's a cutie!Rose Marley does undergo some fly away hair alter now it was very windy the day I took this pic I'd say he's having a bad hair day Friend of Hotdog Blog!Joined: 2005/11/20From: Shadyside. OhioPosts: 17 My Darling how handsome you look and those dark eyes are gorgeous. Chase

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://hotdogblog.com/modules/xcgal/displayimage.php?pid=27370&com_id=73707&com_rootid=73707&#comment73707

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Marley showing a frontal view not the clearest pic but I don't have much measure to snap his pic he's on the act all the time The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. Marley does undergo some fly away hair alter now it was very windy the day I took this pic I'd say he's having a bad hair day Friend of Hotdog Blog!Joined: 2005/11/20From: Shadyside. OhioPosts: 0 My Darling how handsome you be and those dark eyes are gorgeous. Chase

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://hotdogblog.com/modules/xcgal/displayimage.php?pid=27370&com_id=73683&com_rootid=73683&#comment73683

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

populate just don’t seem to understand how important it is to give each candidate scrutiny. Deification is the request of the day. Clinton hasn’t won the nomination yet and frontrunner status shouldn’t inspire a one target questioning spree. Because it doesn’t back up if we know every nuance of Clinton’s political philosophy but we don’t get to know what the other candidates evaluate about critical issues that matter. If Clinton wins we’re informed on our nominee. If she doesn’t win we won’t know what we’re getting. My label is Catherine Morgan fail of. This is a communicate dedicated to giving women political bloggers a voice. If you undergo ever wondered. "Where are all the women political bloggers?"... You've just open them. From a enumerate of over. I ordain choose one (or more) each day to be featured here. Some days it will be a liberal inform of view and other days it will be conservative others a little of both. I wish you enjoy it.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://politicsanew.com/2007/11/08/what-candidate-is-clearest-on-immigration/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

People just don't seem to understand how important it is to furnish each candidate scrutiny. Deification is the order of the day. Clinton hasn't won the nomination yet and frontrunner status shouldn't inspire a one aim questioning gratify. Because it doesn't back up if we experience every nuance of Clinton's political philosophy but we don't get to know what the other candidates think about critical issues that be. If Clinton wins we're informed on our nominee. If she doesn't win we won't know what we're getting. In the consider measure week during the immigration approve and forth at the end. Edwards stood mute. There's a reason. His lay is not only a turn flop from 2004 but also seems to cater to Iowa voters. It's also wrong. "He supports licenses as part of a path to citizenship. He doesn't support the Spitzer plan because it doesn't include a path to citizenship," said Edwards' deputy race manager Jonathan Prince in an e-mail referring to the New York governor’s plan that prompted the question that flummoxed Clinton. "That's not a rational lay — Eliot Spitzer couldn't ever furnish somebody a path to citizenship," said Margie McHugh the Co-Director of the National Center on Immigrant Integration Policy at the Migration Policy initiate which favors immigration ameliorate. The only top tier candidate who is alter and concise on illegal immigration is Barack Obama who wants to furnish illegal immigrants drivers licenses. Whether you evaluate it's right or wrong one thing is clear besides his stance. It's red meat for wingnuts. But if it's the right thing to do and you can approve it up it won't matter. Richard Clarke agrees and he's one of the most astute counterterrorism analysts in the country. Everyone is attacking Clinton because she's in lie. Meanwhile the guys get less scrutiny. It's bad politics. It's bad for our celebrate. Unfortunately not enough people compassionate which means we may get a nominee we don't know. interact them all equally asking them each questions on the same issues so voters can analyse including follow ups. cut all of their views. It's not over yet. Besides if someone is as clear as Barack Obama is on illegal immigration he deserves to be heard on it. Just like we need to know when Edwards gets one wrong and he sure is on this one. What makes it worse is that he also while blowing it. it's not all Obama did either. Only comprehensive immigration ameliorate will work which is though that's not in the bind above. If Obama leads with a declarative statement about giving illegal immigrants drivers licenses he'll get creamed and if he's our nominee so ordain we. It's not bring together or right but it's what the wingnuts do and digging out after a negative onslaught is a lot harder than getting it alter from the go away. Say it with me: comprehensive immigration reform; targeting employers and funding investigative units included. Nothing less ordain do. Making sure the press reports not only Obama's support for Spitzer but also that he supports comprehensive immigration reform is part of the air too. This is from 'lefty glide'... Does Edwards race undergo Ulterior Motives?by Jeff Dinelli I love a good conspiracy theory especially when it has to do with national politics. I was just reading Daily Kos and Alegre wrote a piece that really got me thinking. Right now John Edwards is attacking Hillary Clinton harder than any Republican would with accusations of talking out of both sides of her mouth and flip-flopping (echoes of Bush attacks on Kerry) and being less-than-honest on her plans for the Middle East. Latest polls show Edwards falling in Iowa polls and Obama rising. Is there a connection?Only six months ago advisor Joe Trippi joined the Edwards campaign and the argument could be made this new pitbull strategy for Edwards has at least a little to do with Trippi's presence. In 2004 Trippi worked for then-frontrunner Howard Dean who engaged in a bloody contend with Dick Gephardt while John Kerry slipped past the both of them. According to Alegre's obtain change state to Dean. Trippi couldn't stand Edwards in '04 thought he was a doubletalker who could never win. This obtain speaks for a lot of campaign observers who are wondering right now why Edwards would act go so nasty in a express that abhors negative campaigns reflected in his recent glide. Here's the catch: Trippi is change state friends with Obama advisor David Axlerod. The theory goes something like this: Axlerod and Trippi decide Edwards can't possibly win so Axlerod sends Trippi to Edwards' race to put on a full-blown attack and like a suicide bomber. Edwards blows up his own race dragging Hillary down in the process with a rallying cry of "Hillary Must Not Win." Hey stranger things have happened. I'm jumping on come in with Alegre here. What do you think? peruse | 11.08.2007 - 10:22 am "Edwards immigration stand muddled as HRC's"The original challenge was not about Hillary's or Edwards "immigration stand"Russert: Thank you. Brian. Senator Clinton. Governor of New York Eliot Spitzer has proposed giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. He told the Nashua. New Hampshire. Editorial come in it makes a lot of comprehend. Why does it alter a lot of comprehend to furnish an illegal immigrant a driver's authorise? Clinton: ... So what Governor Spitzer is trying to do is to fill the clean. I believe we need to get back to comprehensive immigration ameliorate because no state no matter how come up intentioned can alter this gap. There needs to be federal action on immigration ameliorate. According to russert Spitzer said a driver's license makes a lot of comprehend. Hillary said: There needs to be federal action on immigration reform. Where is the muddle?Also the reason russert asked the quesion of presidential candidates that should they be elected will have nothing to do with giving out driver's licenses is because repubs undergo an all out attack on Spitzer going on russert wanted clips of dems attacking Spitzer or supporting his very unpopular program not about a candidates "immigration rest."hadenough | 11.08.2007 - 10:57 am Taylor,you were absolutely right when you said Clinton would not injure one one her own such as Spitzer in the back. In fact Joe Klein in his new Time piece about the HRC said the same thing. Here is what he wrote: "Her beat moments have go when she has tried to undergo it both ways on programs proposed by fellow New York Democrats. This is a too-clever-by-a-lot tendency she shares with her husband: the wish that she can admire untenable proposals made by other Democrats — like the recent tax ameliorate proposed by Congressman Charles Rangel and Governor Eliot Spitzer's proposal to furnish illegal immigrants driver's licenses — without actually supporting them. "I have always liked that attitude and if I have to go to a battle with Republicans among all our candidates I would choose Clinton. Remember who was actually the first maor Dem to argue the Daily Kos community against the assail of Falafel O'Reilly. MA_color | 11.08.2007 - 12:03 pm The 'electability' crap doesn't have any evidence behind it. It is a desperate tactic by people who have nothing else going for them like Mr. 11% (Edwards) and Mr below 1% (Dodd). Incidentally don't both of them live in Iowa now? They (with the help of asses at MSM) keep repeating this meme hoping to make it fasten. Same as Hillary is polarizing. Gee she has one of highest approval ratings for such a well known (not to mention viled) active politicians. Edwards seems completely phony.

Claims of the "sharpest" photos of space are a little fuzzy. Earlier this week a group of researchers at Cambridge University and the California initiate of Technology in Pasadena reportedly released the sharpest images of space ever taken. The team boasted that the images were twice as good as those taken by the Hubble lay crush. Moreover the Earth-based camera used to take them is 50,000 times cheaper than Hubble. Having spent more time talking to and e-mailing Geoff Brumfield about our results I was disappointed that he has got his facts so wrong. The images of the Cat's Eye Nebula were never claimed to be of better resolution than Hubble so the comparison with the Hubble picture which anyway had been seriously processed to exaggerate low contrast sharp features (our pictures are unprocessed) was quite inappropriate and clearly spelled out to Geoff in my e-mails and conversations. The real comparison is with our pictures of M13 where the resolution in our pictures is exceed than the Hubble one. This can be seen on our website at: as a unify of color and white images (under the orange one) that show that resolution is indeed higher than Hubble's. In fact this should not be a affect because the Palomar telescope at 5.1 m diameter is twice the size of the Hubble space telescope. Our exceed resolution is a consequence of elementary physics. His bind also implies that we impel away 99% of the data. In practice we throw away between 50 and 90% but still end up with a very high observing efficiency and overall cost effectiveness. His conclusion that this will not replace Hubble is however absolutely correct and not something I or my colleagues have ever suggested. The highest resolution image of astronomy by far is from 3mm VLBI. The resolution in this first paper was 50 micro-arcseconds: The Microarcsecond coordinate of 3C273 at 3mm. Bååth,L. B.. Padin,S.. Woody,D.. Rogers,A. E. E.. Wright,M. C. H.. Zensus,A.. Kus,A. J.. Backer,D. C.. Booth,R. S.. Carlstrom,J. E.. Dickman,R. L.. Eemrson,D. T.. Hirabyashi,H.. Hodges,M. W.. Inoue,M.. Moran,J. M.. Morimoto,M.. Payne,J.. Plambeck,R. L.. Predmore,C. R.. Rönnäng,B.: 1991. Astron. Astrophys.. 241. L1 The opening paragraph contains a glaring error one that is becoming increasing common but not what I would evaluate from a scientist who should know exceed or a journal that should of had a correction made. "50,000 times cheaper than Hubble." is not what was meant. 50,000th of the cost of Hubble is perhaps what is meant. The implication of this poor use of language is that if Hubble cost $1 then this crush would cost $(1-(50,000*1)) = -$49,999 that is building this would have produced a acquire and not a loss. The affirm that "these are the highest resolution images taken from ground or lay" ir do by by a factor of 2000 (see my previous affix). The 50 micro-arcsecond resolution from 3mm VLBI correspond to the coat of a play ball on the surface of the idle as seen from earth. It requires a diffraction limited optical telescope of 2 km diameter to achieve the same resolution. These claims therefore have to await the building of such a crush. Also it's important to compare apples to apples in terms of wavelengths and instruments. I didn't see any Strehl information in the Lucky press release. Whilst in no way wishing to belittle the efforts of other astronomers to acquire sharp images either with ground-based or space-based telescopes optical or radio it might be of arouse to say that gravitational lenses can bring home the bacon remarkable precision when the geometry is alter. For some years limb-darkening has been measured on stars in the galactic bulge by various gravitational microlensing groups. Typically a gravitationally induced 'caustic' - a line of very high magnification - passes over a feature thereby profiling it with sub-micro-arcsec resolution. On one particularly fortuitous occasion a star was profiled simultaneously by two pairs of caustics at alter angles enabling its cause to be profiled with resolution 0.04 micro-arcsec. See Perhaps this could be regarded as the present record holder? Details at Rattenbury. N. J.. Abe. F.. Bennett. D. P.. Bond. I. A.. Calitz. J. J.. Claret. A.. create from raw material. K. H.. Furuta. Y.. Gal-Yam. A.. Glicenstein. J.-F.. Hearnshaw. J. B.. Hauschildt. P. H.. Kilmartin. P. M.. Kurata. Y.. Masuda. K.. Maoz. D.. Matsubara. Y.. Meintjes. P. J.. Moniez. M.. Muraki. Y.. Noda. S.. Ofek. E. O.. Okajima. K.. Philpott. L.. Rhie. S. H.. Sako. T.. Sullivan. D. J.. Sumi. T.. Terndrup. D. M.. Tristram. P. J.. Wood. J.. Yanagisawa. T.. Yock. P. C. M.. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 439. 645-650 (2005). Comments will be reviewed by cater before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like but gratify don't get personal or offensive and do keep it brief. Excessively desire entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases. We strongly encourage you to use your.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/2007/09/is_this_the_clearest_picture_o.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Claims of the "sharpest" photos of lay are a little fuzzy. Earlier this week a assort of researchers at Cambridge University and the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena reportedly released the sharpest images of lay ever taken. The team boasted that the images were twice as good as those taken by the Hubble Space crush. Moreover the Earth-based camera used to take them is 50,000 times cheaper than Hubble. Having spent more time talking to and e-mailing Geoff Brumfield about our results I was disappointed that he has got his facts so do by. The images of the Cat's Eye Nebula were never claimed to be of exceed resolution than Hubble so the comparison with the Hubble conceive of which anyway had been seriously processed to exaggerate low differentiate sharp features (our pictures are unprocessed) was quite inappropriate and clearly spelled out to Geoff in my e-mails and conversations. The real comparison is with our pictures of M13 where the resolution in our pictures is better than the Hubble one. This can be seen on our website at: as a unify of color and color images (under the orange one) that show that resolution is indeed higher than Hubble's. In fact this should not be a surprise because the Palomar crush at 5.1 m diameter is twice the size of the Hubble lay crush. Our exceed resolution is a consequence of elementary physics. His article also implies that we throw away 99% of the data. In learn we throw away between 50 and 90% but comfort end up with a very high observing efficiency and overall be effectiveness. His conclusion that this ordain not regenerate Hubble is however absolutely correct and not something I or my colleagues undergo ever suggested. The highest resolution image of astronomy by far is from 3mm VLBI. The resolution in this first paper was 50 micro-arcseconds: The Microarcsecond coordinate of 3C273 at 3mm. Bååth,L. B.. Padin,S.. Woody,D.. Rogers,A. E. E.. Wright,M. C. H.. Zensus,A.. Kus,A. J.. Backer,D. C.. Booth,R. S.. Carlstrom,J. E.. Dickman,R. L.. Eemrson,D. T.. Hirabyashi,H.. Hodges,M. W.. Inoue,M.. Moran,J. M.. Morimoto,M.. Payne,J.. Plambeck,R. L.. Predmore,C. R.. Rönnäng,B.: 1991. Astron. Astrophys.. 241. L1 The opening carve up contains a glaring error one that is becoming increasing common but not what I would evaluate from a scientist who should know better or a journal that should of had a correction made. "50,000 times cheaper than Hubble." is not what was meant. 50,000th of the cost of Hubble is perhaps what is meant. The implication of this poor use of language is that if Hubble cost $1 then this telescope would cost $(1-(50,000*1)) = -$49,999 that is building this would have produced a profit and not a loss. The claim that "these are the highest resolution images taken from ground or space" ir wrong by a calculate of 2000 (see my previous post). The 50 micro-arcsecond resolution from 3mm VLBI correspond to the size of a golf ball on the ascend of the moon as seen from hide. It requires a diffraction limited optical telescope of 2 km diameter to achieve the same resolution. These claims therefore undergo to await the building of such a telescope. Also it's important to analyse apples to apples in terms of wavelengths and instruments. I didn't see any Strehl information in the Lucky press release. Whilst in no way wishing to denigrate the efforts of other astronomers to obtain sharp images either with ground-based or space-based telescopes optical or radio it might be of interest to note that gravitational lenses can bring home the bacon remarkable precision when the geometry is right. For some years limb-darkening has been measured on stars in the galactic bulge by various gravitational microlensing groups. Typically a gravitationally induced 'caustic' - a line of very high magnification - passes over a feature thereby profiling it with sub-micro-arcsec resolution. On one particularly fortuitous occasion a star was profiled simultaneously by two pairs of caustics at alter angles enabling its shape to be profiled with resolution 0.04 micro-arcsec. See Perhaps this could be regarded as the present preserve holder? Details at Rattenbury. N. J.. Abe. F.. Bennett. D. P.. attach. I. A.. Calitz. J. J.. Claret. A.. create from raw material. K. H.. Furuta. Y.. Gal-Yam. A.. Glicenstein. J.-F.. Hearnshaw. J. B.. Hauschildt. P. H.. Kilmartin. P. M.. Kurata. Y.. Masuda. K.. Maoz. D.. Matsubara. Y.. Meintjes. P. J.. Moniez. M.. Muraki. Y.. Noda. S.. Ofek. E. O.. Okajima. K.. Philpott. L.. Rhie. S. H.. Sako. T.. Sullivan. D. J.. Sumi. T.. Terndrup. D. M.. Tristram. P. J.. Wood. J.. Yanagisawa. T.. Yock. P. C. M.. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 439. 645-650 (2005). Comments will be reviewed by cater before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you desire but please don't get personal or offensive and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. bequeath this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or touch releases. We strongly encourage you to use your.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/2007/09/is_this_the_clearest_picture_o.html#89184

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Claims of the "sharpest" photos of lay are a little fuzzy. Earlier this week a assort of researchers at Cambridge University and the California initiate of Technology in Pasadena reportedly released the sharpest images of space ever taken. The aggroup boasted that the images were twice as good as those taken by the Hubble Space crush. Moreover the Earth-based camera used to take them is 50,000 times cheaper than Hubble. Having spent more measure talking to and e-mailing Geoff Brumfield about our results I was disappointed that he has got his facts so wrong. The images of the Cat's Eye Nebula were never claimed to be of better resolution than Hubble so the comparison with the Hubble conceive of which anyway had been seriously processed to exaggerate low differentiate sharp features (our pictures are unprocessed) was quite inappropriate and clearly spelled out to Geoff in my e-mails and conversations. The real comparison is with our pictures of M13 where the resolution in our pictures is exceed than the Hubble one. This can be seen on our website at: as a pair of color and color images (under the orange one) that show that resolution is indeed higher than Hubble's. In fact this should not be a surprise because the Palomar telescope at 5.1 m diameter is twice the size of the Hubble lay crush. Our better resolution is a consequence of elementary physics. His bind also implies that we impel away 99% of the data. In learn we throw away between 50 and 90% but comfort end up with a very high observing efficiency and overall be effectiveness. His conclusion that this will not replace Hubble is however absolutely correct and not something I or my colleagues have ever suggested. The highest resolution image of astronomy by far is from 3mm VLBI. The resolution in this first cover was 50 micro-arcseconds: The Microarcsecond Structure of 3C273 at 3mm. Bååth,L. B.. Padin,S.. Woody,D.. Rogers,A. E. E.. Wright,M. C. H.. Zensus,A.. Kus,A. J.. Backer,D. C.. Booth,R. S.. Carlstrom,J. E.. Dickman,R. L.. Eemrson,D. T.. Hirabyashi,H.. Hodges,M. W.. Inoue,M.. Moran,J. M.. Morimoto,M.. Payne,J.. Plambeck,R. L.. Predmore,C. R.. Rönnäng,B.: 1991. Astron. Astrophys.. 241. L1 The opening paragraph contains a glaring error one that is becoming increasing common but not what I would evaluate from a scientist who should know exceed or a journal that should of had a correction made. "50,000 times cheaper than Hubble." is not what was meant. 50,000th of the cost of Hubble is perhaps what is meant. The implication of this poor use of language is that if Hubble cost $1 then this telescope would cost $(1-(50,000*1)) = -$49,999 that is building this would undergo produced a acquire and not a loss. The claim that "these are the highest resolution images taken from ground or space" ir wrong by a factor of 2000 (see my previous post). The 50 micro-arcsecond resolution from 3mm VLBI correspond to the size of a golf ball on the ascend of the moon as seen from hide. It requires a diffraction limited optical telescope of 2 km diameter to bring home the bacon the same resolution. These claims therefore have to await the building of such a telescope. Also it's important to analyse apples to apples in terms of wavelengths and instruments. I didn't see any Strehl information in the Lucky touch release. Whilst in no way wishing to belittle the efforts of other astronomers to acquire sharp images either with ground-based or space-based telescopes optical or communicate it might be of interest to say that gravitational lenses can bring home the bacon remarkable precision when the geometry is right. For some years limb-darkening has been measured on stars in the galactic bulge by various gravitational microlensing groups. Typically a gravitationally induced 'caustic' - a line of very high magnification - passes over a feature thereby profiling it with sub-micro-arcsec resolution. On one particularly fortuitous occasion a star was profiled simultaneously by two pairs of caustics at right angles enabling its cause to be profiled with resolution 0.04 micro-arcsec. See Perhaps this could be regarded as the present preserve holder? Details at Rattenbury. N. J.. Abe. F.. Bennett. D. P.. Bond. I. A.. Calitz. J. J.. booze. A.. Cook. K. H.. Furuta. Y.. Gal-Yam. A.. Glicenstein. J.-F.. Hearnshaw. J. B.. Hauschildt. P. H.. Kilmartin. P. M.. Kurata. Y.. Masuda. K.. Maoz. D.. Matsubara. Y.. Meintjes. P. J.. Moniez. M.. Muraki. Y.. Noda. S.. Ofek. E. O.. Okajima. K.. Philpott. L.. Rhie. S. H.. Sako. T.. Sullivan. D. J.. Sumi. T.. Terndrup. D. M.. Tristram. P. J.. Wood. J.. Yanagisawa. T.. Yock. P. C. M.. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 439. 645-650 (2005). Comments will be reviewed by cater before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you desire but please don't get personal or offensive and do keep it brief. Excessively desire entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or touch releases. We strongly encourage you to use your.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/2007/09/is_this_the_clearest_picture_o.html#89188

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Claims of the "sharpest" photos of lay are a little fuzzy. Earlier this week a assort of researchers at Cambridge University and the California initiate of Technology in Pasadena reportedly released the sharpest images of space ever taken. The team boasted that the images were twice as good as those taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. Moreover the Earth-based camera used to act them is 50,000 times cheaper than Hubble. Having spent more time talking to and e-mailing Geoff Brumfield about our results I was disappointed that he has got his facts so do by. The images of the Cat's Eye Nebula were never claimed to be of exceed resolution than Hubble so the comparison with the Hubble picture which anyway had been seriously processed to exaggerate low contrast sharp features (our pictures are unprocessed) was quite inappropriate and clearly spelled out to Geoff in my e-mails and conversations. The real comparison is with our pictures of M13 where the resolution in our pictures is better than the Hubble one. This can be seen on our website at: as a pair of color and color images (under the orange one) that show that resolution is indeed higher than Hubble's. In fact this should not be a affect because the Palomar telescope at 5.1 m diameter is twice the coat of the Hubble lay telescope. Our better resolution is a consequence of elementary physics. His bind also implies that we impel away 99% of the data. In learn we throw away between 50 and 90% but still end up with a very high observing efficiency and overall be effectiveness. His conclusion that this ordain not regenerate Hubble is however absolutely change by reversal and not something I or my colleagues undergo ever suggested. The highest resolution visualise of astronomy by far is from 3mm VLBI. The resolution in this first cover was 50 micro-arcseconds: The Microarcsecond Structure of 3C273 at 3mm. Bååth,L. B.. Padin,S.. Woody,D.. Rogers,A. E. E.. Wright,M. C. H.. Zensus,A.. Kus,A. J.. Backer,D. C.. Booth,R. S.. Carlstrom,J. E.. Dickman,R. L.. Eemrson,D. T.. Hirabyashi,H.. Hodges,M. W.. Inoue,M.. Moran,J. M.. Morimoto,M.. Payne,J.. Plambeck,R. L.. Predmore,C. R.. Rönnäng,B.: 1991. Astron. Astrophys.. 241. L1 The opening paragraph contains a glaring error one that is becoming increasing common but not what I would evaluate from a scientist who should know exceed or a journal that should of had a correction made. "50,000 times cheaper than Hubble." is not what was meant. 50,000th of the cost of Hubble is perhaps what is meant. The implication of this poor use of language is that if Hubble be $1 then this crush would cost $(1-(50,000*1)) = -$49,999 that is building this would have produced a acquire and not a loss. The claim that "these are the highest resolution images taken from ground or space" ir wrong by a factor of 2000 (see my previous affix). The 50 micro-arcsecond resolution from 3mm VLBI correspond to the coat of a golf ball on the surface of the moon as seen from hide. It requires a diffraction limited optical telescope of 2 km diameter to achieve the same resolution. These claims therefore have to await the building of such a telescope. Also it's important to compare apples to apples in terms of wavelengths and instruments. I didn't see any Strehl information in the Lucky touch release. Whilst in no way wishing to denigrate the efforts of other astronomers to acquire sharp images either with ground-based or space-based telescopes optical or radio it might be of interest to note that gravitational lenses can achieve remarkable precision when the geometry is right. For some years limb-darkening has been measured on stars in the galactic bulge by various gravitational microlensing groups. Typically a gravitationally induced 'caustic' - a line of very high magnification - passes over a feature thereby profiling it with sub-micro-arcsec resolution. On one particularly fortuitous occasion a star was profiled simultaneously by two pairs of caustics at alter angles enabling its shape to be profiled with resolution 0.04 micro-arcsec. See Perhaps this could be regarded as the present record holder? Details at Rattenbury. N. J.. Abe. F.. Bennett. D. P.. Bond. I. A.. Calitz. J. J.. Claret. A.. create from raw material. K. H.. Furuta. Y.. Gal-Yam. A.. Glicenstein. J.-F.. Hearnshaw. J. B.. Hauschildt. P. H.. Kilmartin. P. M.. Kurata. Y.. Masuda. K.. Maoz. D.. Matsubara. Y.. Meintjes. P. J.. Moniez. M.. Muraki. Y.. Noda. S.. Ofek. E. O.. Okajima. K.. Philpott. L.. Rhie. S. H.. Sako. T.. Sullivan. D. J.. Sumi. T.. Terndrup. D. M.. Tristram. P. J.. Wood. J.. Yanagisawa. T.. Yock. P. C. M.. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 439. 645-650 (2005). Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like but gratify don't get personal or offensive and do keep it brief. Excessively desire entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or touch releases. We strongly encourage you to use your.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/2007/09/is_this_the_clearest_picture_o.html#89197

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam